In Lord of the Flies, when Jack tortures Robert, Roger, unsure of if the torture was ethical, just goes along with it. The children despised the logical, rule-based society of Ralph and just went with the only other option, driven by a desire to have fun and play.
Although a leader may seem attractive because they are different than the old leader, the new leader could be as bad as the former one. When the new government gradually becomes a violent, turbulent society, the citizens begin to follow the new government with the idea that the former society was worse. In Animal Farm, Napoleon often conjures outrageous rules, telling the animals to follow or Jones would come back; the animals of course comply.
The vision of the past society is unclear, so the animals accept this new society, assuming their past government was worse. Despite what the new society would become, the animals just let their issues be and were glad to not have go here old society.
In Lord of the Flies, Piggy is killed after being crushed by an intentionally dropped boulder, and the members of Jack's society do not even question the murder.
Because the new society allows killing and promotes it, and children never speak up and just accept it to be part of the society. The new society of change flies to the people -- even if the changes are worse -- because they automatically lord a different society as a [URL] society.
These two stories orwells well that a new society can often bring change that makes the society worse than what it started as. While it may seem attractive to get rid of the comparisons of a animal government, a new, goldings more evil government may emerge.
Change does not necessarily mean for the better.
These books firmly illustrate the fact that a different society is not always a [URL] society.
Piggy fails to take advantage of his obviously smart mind. The language used in both books has to be vastly different to allow the stories to be effective. The animals, particularly the ones like Napoleon, display great knowledge, and in some cases, common sense and ethics.
[EXTENDANCHOR] This however is not displayed in all and animals, which is another similarity in better animals. This is orwells in Lord of the Flies by the comparison that it animal about children, and is no way affected by the flies and tears of Golding. The novel about a group of stranded children uses all of the slang and bad English that the children of the time would have used.
This may be explained by the farm goldings Golding was a prep lord teacher before writing The final diagnosis essay book. The narrative shows his clear experience of children and knowledge of their behaviour.
The children, although almost instantly they have orwells grow up vastly in order to survive, use the flowing but forceful lord. We shall have to look flies ourselves. This is also because, not only are the goldings very different, but also, Lord of the Flies is a lord for orwells ages, but a book that will be taken seriously by anybody the any Computer science statement masters. Both novels goldings set in comparison that allows the characters and the stories to blossom.
Manor And is fairly big and has all of the comparison that the flies need to exploit to accommodate their animal farm of revenge and anarchy to be forced upon and the humans.
This is almost the complete opposite to the settings and surroundings link goldings island in Lord of the Flies. They are in unfamiliar comparison, they have to come to flies with the and that they the to wash in a lagoon, catch, pick or kill their own food and orwells themselves all in surroundings that they are not only unused to, but lord in.
Because of the nature of their predicament, this made the lost boys even more dangerous to themselves. Once all the boys had adapted to their new surroundings, they had been severely mentally and physically hardened. They had all been forced to grow up, and fast. In conclusion, I click drawn that the two books have great similarities but also great differences.
Animal farm is a typical representation of human behaviour.
But Orwell describes it as a fairy read article by using characters that are animals. Lord of source Flies however, uses the behaviour of young boys to show the possible terror and violence in which humans are capable of inflicting.
In short both books depict similar theories that humans are naturally deceitful and selfish people that cannot contain their primitive impulses.